Warning: include_once(/home/arpa/api/v0.1/core.php): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-content/themes/wnal/functions.php on line 19

Warning: include_once(): Failed opening '/home/arpa/api/v0.1/core.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:') in /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-content/themes/wnal/functions.php on line 19

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-content/themes/wnal/functions.php:19) in /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1673

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-content/themes/wnal/functions.php:19) in /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1673

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-content/themes/wnal/functions.php:19) in /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1673

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-content/themes/wnal/functions.php:19) in /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1673

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-content/themes/wnal/functions.php:19) in /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1673

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-content/themes/wnal/functions.php:19) in /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1673

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-content/themes/wnal/functions.php:19) in /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1673

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-content/themes/wnal/functions.php:19) in /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1673
{"id":2456,"date":"2018-01-11T08:38:52","date_gmt":"2018-01-11T16:38:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/test.weneedalaw.ca\/?p=2456"},"modified":"2021-08-05T09:57:51","modified_gmt":"2021-08-05T16:57:51","slug":"feminism-word-of-the-year","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/test.weneedalaw.ca\/2018\/01\/feminism-word-of-the-year\/","title":{"rendered":"“Feminism” was 2017’s Word of the Year, but not for the right reasons"},"content":{"rendered":"

As we head into a new year, there is a looking forward, but also a looking back. What did 2017 bring us? For one thing, \u201cfeminism\u201d was named the \u201cword of the year\u201d <\/a>\u00a0by Merriam-Webster Dictionary, and interest in the word peaked particularly around certain events billed as \u201cfeminist\u201d, including the Women\u2019s March and #MeToo<\/a> movement.<\/p>\n

\"Feminism<\/p>\n

New York Post<\/a> journalist Nicole Russell rightly feels disappointed at what \u201cfeminism\u201d accomplished last year, and concludes this:<\/p>\n

\u201cNow modern feminists wield their gender like a weapon not to create equality but to demand entitlement, not to improve or increase all women\u2019s rights, but only the rights of women with whom they align politically.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

In America, the Women\u2019s March organizers refused<\/a> to welcome pro-life groups as sponsors after online backlash\u00a0labelled\u00a0pro-life groups as anti-women. We saw the political pressure a feminist claim can bring in Canada as well. MP Rachael Harder was held back<\/a> from a position as Head of the Status of Women Committee when Liberal and NDP MPs – fellow women – judged her unable to adequately represent women since she does not advocate for abortion. Our tax dollars were spent liberally in a \u201cfeminist international assistance policy\u201d that focused on access to abortion<\/a> as a crucial change to be brought to nations who do not even want abortion.<\/p>\n

Feminism, as Russell keenly pointed out, is no longer a movement by women for the empowerment of women. It has become a movement of women with a particular, dogged focus on abortion access. Women themselves are told they do not qualify as representatives of their sex, and that they are unwelcome at \u201cfeminist\u201d events. Meanwhile, men who toe the line of reproductive freedom at the great cost of pre-born human life are called feminists instead.<\/p>\n

When women are no longer willing to consider other women\u2019s voices as valid, they add, whether they want to or not, to a culture that needed #MeToo. The #MeToo movement is rightly about speaking up and eliminating shame, or at least placing that shame squarely where it belongs. Yet the \u201cfeminist\u201d term attached to the movement is the same one from the Women\u2019s March that tells other women that their voices are not valid, that they should be quiet and take orders.<\/p>\n

Women claiming the banner of feminism are creating a space where political, ideological and star power are used to trample, shame and devalue those who disagree.<\/p>\n

Serrin Foster, President of Feminists for Life, writes<\/a>, \u201cProperly defined, feminism is a philosophy that embraces basic rights for all human beings without exception\u2026. Feminism rejects the use of force to dominate, control or destroy anyone.\u201d<\/p>\n

Moving forward into 2018, let\u2019s hold on to this <\/em>feminism, a feminism that does not need to tear down or destroy in order to feel built up. Let\u2019s advocate for a feminism that doesn\u2019t dominate, but cooperates. This feminism values life in all its stages, even at great personal inconvenience.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As we head into a new year, there is a looking forward, but also a looking back. What did 2017 bring us? For one thing, \u201cfeminism\u201d was named the \u201cword of the year\u201d \u00a0by Merriam-Webster Dictionary, and interest in the word peaked particularly around certain events billed as \u201cfeminist\u201d, including the Women\u2019s March and #MeToo […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3014,"featured_media":2458,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[281,284,282,280],"tags":[704,200,459,731,730],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.weneedalaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2456"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.weneedalaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.weneedalaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.weneedalaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3014"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.weneedalaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2456"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/test.weneedalaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2456\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2459,"href":"https:\/\/test.weneedalaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2456\/revisions\/2459"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.weneedalaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2458"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/test.weneedalaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.weneedalaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/test.weneedalaw.ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}