Warning: include_once(/home/arpa/api/v0.1/core.php): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-content/themes/wnal/functions.php on line 19

Warning: include_once(): Failed opening '/home/arpa/api/v0.1/core.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:') in /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-content/themes/wnal/functions.php on line 19

Warning: Undefined array key "post_type" in /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-content/themes/wnal/functions.php on line 131

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-content/themes/wnal/functions.php:19) in /home/arpa/test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-includes/feed-rss2.php on line 8
Burnaby – We Need A Law https://test.weneedalaw.ca Thu, 05 Aug 2021 16:59:25 +0000 en-CA hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.9 https://test.weneedalaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/cropped-wnal-logo-00afad-1231-32x32.png Burnaby – We Need A Law https://test.weneedalaw.ca 32 32 Faye Sonier: The Joyce Arthur Defamation Suit and the Tactic of Being Vague https://test.weneedalaw.ca/2013/09/faye-sonier-and-joyce-arthur-being-vague/ Fri, 27 Sep 2013 21:19:07 +0000 http://wpsb2.dev.hearkenmedia.com/2013/09/27/faye-sonier-and-joyce-arthur-being-vague/ Faye SonierFaye Sonier over at Evangelical Fellowship of Canada has written an excellent piece on the recent decision of the Vancouver and Burnaby Crisis Pregnancy Centres announcement that they would not be appealing a court’s decision in a defamation suit against pro-choice activist Joyce Arthur.

You can read the entire piece here, but we include this quote from Ms. Sonier:

“This report is hugely damaging to CPCs in B.C., as well as the rest of Canada. I understand why the CPCs are not pursuing the suit further. Given how unspecific Arthur was in her allegations, an appeal of the decision would be a tough, uphill and costly legal battle. I like that the CPCs will issue a rebuttal of Arthur’s allegations. This is a reasoned response to a near impossible situation.

But I’m still frustrated. I’m frustrated that a poorly crafted, government funded report will tarnish the reputation of Canadian CPCs. Unlike Arthur’s shoddy research, CPCs are funded not by tax-payers but by private donors so centres can offer free services and resources to women and families facing unplanned or crisis pregnancies.”

Ms. Sonier encourages the reader to send a note of encouragement to your local crisis pregnancy centre and we do the same. For the contact information for the centre nearest you click here.

]]>
Never again will I complain about golfing! https://test.weneedalaw.ca/2013/09/never-again-will-i-complain-about-golfing/ Thu, 26 Sep 2013 05:05:53 +0000 http://wpsb2.dev.hearkenmedia.com/2013/09/25/never-again-will-i-complain-about-golfing/ A few years ago John Hof invited me to join his team at a charity golf tournament and I’ve gladly joined him every year since.

Charity golf tournaments are occasions for wholesome fun and last Saturday’s tournament was no different. Although the skies had a lot less blue than we had hoped for, as John and I headed over the mighty Fraser River to the picturesque IMG 00000901landscape along the foot of the majestic Coastal Mountains we were not going to be deterred. The proceeds of this charity golf tournament were going to support the Crisis Pregnancy Centres of Vancouver and Burnaby (the ‘Centres’) and a few drops of rain were not going to stop us from contributing to their efforts.

In the weeks and days leading up to Saturday’s event John and I had been busy soliciting funds in an attempt to meet both our personal and team goals. Even with the means of modern technology and communication this involves some effort. Thankfully, on the evening prior to the event, we surpassed our goal of raising $4000.00!

Truth be told, I had to push myself out the door at 6:30 that dark and dreary Saturday morning. Especially after just being home for two days following a weeklong trip through Alberta. But those thoughts quickly disappeared when Brian Norton offered me a rambunctious greeting upon my arrival at the Golden Eagles Golf Course. Brian is the Executive Director of the Centres and his infectious smile and enthusiasm rival that of a young child coming down the stairs on Christmas morning.

Day after day, Brian toils selflessly in his capacity as Executive Director. He exemplifies what it is to have a servant heart and is always setting aside his own desires to do what is best for others. Brian’s character is mirrored in the mission of the Centres. Their mission is to provide compassionate help to women experiencing unplanned pregnancies, post abortion grief, domestic violence, and sexual assault. They are on the frontlines of assisting some of the most vulnerable people in society and regularly help women make informed choices that set them on the path to a better life.

You would think that the work of the Centres (much of which is done by volunteers) would be appreciated and valued by everyone, but that is not the case. As I wrote a few weeks ago, Joyce Arthur and her pro-abortion friends can’t stand the fact that some women may choose for life after being assisted by staff and peer counsellors at the Centres. Ms. Arthur has openly stated that she has her sights set on crisis pregnancy centres in order to expose their religious foundations and “deceitful tactics”. In a 65-page document titled, Exposing Crisis Pregnancy Centres (CPCs) in British Columbia she asserts that crisis pregnancy centres were “using graphic videos and pictures to shock and horrify young women about abortion” and that “CPCs won’t say up front they are religious and will lie about being religiously-affiliated to get a woman into the centre”. In view of this document being public and possibly affecting how the Centres were viewed by British Columbians, a Notice of Civil Claim was filed against Ms. Arthur on October 12, 2012 alleging defamation. Last month a judge decided to dismiss the lawsuit and today the Crisis Pregnancy Centres of Vancouver and Burnaby issued a press release saying they won’t appeal the ruling.

In spite of the unjust attacks they will undoubtedly continue to receive from Ms. Arthur, Brian Norton is resolved to continue serving women in their time of need. He says, “Notwithstanding what an activist with a stated political agenda against CPCs may allege, we think the opinion that counts is the opinion of our clients.” Norton then lists just a few comments left by clients on their ‘exit forms’:

  • “Thanks for listening to me and giving me a way to solve my troubles.”
  • “I have no words to say how thankful I am for all your love, help and support.”
  • “It was really good to know there is someone to support me and listen to me.”
  • “Wonderful people in your [charity]. Words cannot describe all the appreciation I feel so deep inside.”

Norton also shares sentiments left by their most recent clients who came seeking help for their post abortion grief issues:

  • “I found a peaceful, supportive, safe and loving environment.”
  • “I felt very loved and accepted.”
  • “Great healing took place in unexpected ways.”
  • “Very caring, loving.  A safe place.”

“Women facing crisis pregnancies or experiencing problems following an abortion,” concludes Norton, “can have confidence that our Centres adhere to the highest standards of counselling ethics and provide accurate information and non-judgmental help.”

This is exactly the attitude one needs when faced with the aggressive tactics of those who celebrate abortion!

Never again will I feel bad about getting out of my warm bed on a cold, rainy morning to do my miniscule part in ensuring they have the financial means to carry out their mission. It is my prayer that Brian and all those who labour with him for the good of others will do so with steadfast resolve!

]]>
In Defence of Crisis Pregnancy Centres https://test.weneedalaw.ca/2013/09/in-defence-of-cpcs/ Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:09:52 +0000 http://wpsb2.dev.hearkenmedia.com/2013/09/11/in-defence-of-cpcs/ Last month, BC Supreme Court Madam Justice Russell decided to dismiss the defamation lawsuit launched by two women’s care centres against a pro-choice activist. In 2009, Joyce Arthur and her Pro-Choice Action Network released a publication titled, Exposing Crisis Pregnancy Centres in British Columbia. The 65-page document asserted that crisis pregnancy centres (CPCs) were “using graphic videos and pictures to shock and horrify young women about abortion” and that “CPCs won’t say up front they are religious, and will lie about being religiously-affiliated to get a woman into the centre”.

cpcsThe Christian Advocacy Society of Greater Vancouver (I’m not sure how much more up front about religious affiliation you can be) and the Crisis Pregnancy Centre of Vancouver Society filed a Notice of Civil Claim on October 12, 2012 alleging defamation against Ms. Arthur and the Pro-Choice Action Network on the basis that the above mentioned assertions, and other serious allegations, were false. One of the main purposes of these organizations is to provide care for women with unplanned pregnancies.

The ruling is being viewed as a victory for Ms. Arthur and undoubtedly she will continue to wage war against those who work toward minimizing the number of abortions in Canada. Indeed, only a few days after her victory, Ms. Arthur began calling for the British Columbia government to regulate CPCs. She is quoted in a Straight.com article stating that CPCs are “scaring” women and “handing out misinformation”.

Ms. Arthur’s new media statements are contrary to her own lawyer’s position in written and oral submissions to the court – accepted by the judge – that the CPCs defamation case should be dismissed because the allegations in her report were NOT about BC CPCs.

Further, nearly all CPCs in Canada are members of the Canadian Association of Pregnancy Support Services and are subject to the highest standard of counselling ethics, as well as Canada Revenue Agency guidelines pertaining to political activity.

Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion provider in North America, consistently cites the second most common reason women seek abortion as an inability to afford the costs associated with raising a child. At a crisis pregnancy centre, trained counsellors come alongside such women and in a pastoral manner are able to seek ways in which economic barriers can be overcome. (Having been at  a few of their fundraising events, I can attest to their prudent use of resources for this purpose.) The end result could be that a previously distraught woman (who may well have thought her only choice was abortion) is able to consider another choice that was, in her mind, previously unavailable to her and can carry on with the pregnancy in confident expectation of childbirth. What callous person would be opposed to giving a woman this choice? Who could be opposed to such compassion and human kindness?

A large majority of Canadians are not comfortable with the high rate of abortions and the truth is that CPCs play an important role in minimizing the perceived need for a woman to terminate her pregnancy. They are on the frontlines of assisting those who need help.

Rather than taking the approach of Ms. Arthur by impeding a woman’s right to choose life for her pre-born child, we should be doing all we can to ensure they have the means to carry out this important work of providing alternative and viable choices for women.

]]>